Concession Agreement In Arabic

“The views of both parties agree on this point. In its last monument (No. 20, p. i9), the government recognizes that the principles of Muslim interpretation are the same as those recognized by other laws and international law. Aramco (Memorial, Nos) shares the same point of view. zi3-y, 58-59). It is true that the government (Memorial, Appendix I, i3, p. 6 and 27, s. zq-z5) indicates that the Hanbali School of Muslim Law simplifies methods of interpretation. One of the basic principles that is followed by physicians of Muslim law is that generic concepts must be fully interpreted and given the general purpose that is implicit in their community, unless they are limited by a particular qualification that limits their scope and requires a restrictive interpretation. But this principle of interpretation is not absolute.

As with other Iega1 systems, it is dominated by the principle that, in seeking the common intention of the parties, the stated intention must take precedence and that the importance of the treaty must be found within the framework of the agreement, including the consideration of all the terms used by the contracting parties. The methods of interpreting legal acts are not absolute. The methods to be used on a case-by-case basis differ depending on the circumstances of each dispute. The interpreter must be inspired by the principle of good faith. It recalls that, in their agreements, the parties intend to create an appropriate contractual situation, in accordance with the common objective they had in mind. “Among the few examples of this latter situation, the parties have identified the cases of Radio Corporation of America in China1 and Radio Corporation of America in Czechoslovakia2, both of which were decided by arbitration decisions. Both cases gave rise to similar problems, in some ways comparable to those in this case, in that they also concerned a state of admission that had granted a second dealer rights that had granted the first dealer the co-association with his own rights. As in the case of Aramco, namely a government, a foreign dealer and a competitor that was also a foreign dealer, the same triangular situation is found. “The interpretation of the acts is not done in the same way as the interpretation of the statutes and is more difficult, as it is intended not only to clarify the importance of the general and abstract principles of the legislature, but also to examine what was the common intention of the contracting parties at the time of the signing of their agreement; This involves examining the terms they use and their behaviour, which in business practices amount to a show of will and sometimes even silence.